As usual, time passes by and the need to build new and modern web features and applications arises. Nowadays, Reactive Web apps are the logical step for a client that desires to use OutSystems (OS). However, OS presented a new visual programming tool which promises to speed the development, called OutSystems Developer Cloud (ODC).
Due to that, some questions came up and were raised: Which way of programming should be implemented by the client? Should an existing customer want to change their apps from Traditional to Reactive or ODC? What are the advantages and disadvantages of programming in Traditional, Reactive, or ODC?
As soon as Reactive begins its magic, the differences and advantages rise to the surface: faster development, short time-to-market, superior user experiences, data-rich interfaces that adapt to changes in real-time, without the need for highly skilled front-end developers or a wide range of different code frameworks.
Traditional Web |
Reactive Web |
Server-side logic and jQuery |
Server-side and client-side logic |
Synchronous data |
Asynchronous data fetching |
Explicit server-side rendering |
Reactive client-side rendering |
Technically speaking, there are some differences to be considered:
There are a lot of features that Reactive can offer, such as:
ODC Studio is the OutSystems Developer Cloud’s low code visual development presented back in November 2022. This new visual programming tool promises to speed development because the infrastructure of both development platforms (for building and developing apps) and the independent runtime are live in the cloud.
|
Why it matters? |
Why ODC over O11? |
High scale use case |
Many customers have use cases that have high levels or scale or unpredictable workloads. |
ODC architecture can scale to higher levels and can react much faster to scaling needs both predicted and unpredicted. |
Enterprise Architecture Innovation |
Cloud native is complex and building AppDev platforms on Kubernetes is really hard and expensive. |
ODC checks the boxes for Cloud Native Architecture and allows customers to start building apps in innovation while taking advantage of cloud-native benefits. |
Next-Gen Platform |
Customer wants to start experimenting with ODC and be part of the initial feedback group. |
The rate of innovation in ODC is much higher than O11. OutSystems investment in ODC nowadays is clear and many customers want their voice to be heard in shaping its future. |
In conclusion, it is important to recognize that both Reactive and ODC way of programming come with their set of advantages and disadvantages. The decision between the two should be carefully considered by the client, as there is no definitive perfect choice, only a better choice based on specific project requirements.
For a more comprehensive understanding of how to smoothly transition from Reactive to ODC and prepare for the future, please refer to our previously published article: From OutSystems 11 to ODC.
WRITTEN BY: Ana Agostinho | OutSystems Developer